20th Annual International Conference of the 
Association for the Study of Dreams
o
June 27 - July 1,  2003
o
Berkeley, California

ABSTRACT


Getting the Dream Down and Following Where It Leads

Dr. Iain R. Edgar
Lecturer in Social Anthropology
Department of Anthropology.
University of Durham
email:
I.R.Edgar@Durham.ac.uk

Iain Edgar lectures in Anthropology at Durham University, U.K. His Ph.D study (Keele University, U.K.) of meaning-making in dreamwork groups was published in Dreamwork, Anthropology and the Caring Professions: A Cultural Approach to Dreamwork, Avebury 1995. He is currently writing a book on using imagery, including dream, as a research methodology.

Summary of Presentation

I argue that an imagination-based research methodology, particularly including dreamwork, constitutes a coherent research methodology and field. By methodology, I mean that such research draws on a distinctive: epistemology, theory, research questions, group and researcher process, research ethics and practice, reflexive/bias issues, questions of validity, replicability, validity and so forth.

Learning Objectives.

  1. Gain an understanding of the potential use of an imagination-based qualitative research methodology.
  2. Understand the distinction between the imaginal and the imagination and the defining criteria involved.
  3. Understand the distinctive methodological features defining an imagination-based research methodology.

Evaluation questions:


Abstract 

In this paper I argue, with examples from my own dream and imagework groups, that imagination-based research methods, including dreamwork, constitutes a coherent research methodology, which can be related to and integrated with other innovative research methodologies, such as transpersonal (Baud & Anderson 1998), participatory (Pretty et al 1995) and arts-based research methodologies.

Overall, I propose that researching the experience, observation, recollection, telling, meaning attribution and external artistic performance of the internal image of the subject(s) constitutes a research arena, domain or field that is of increasing importance in the holistic study of contemporary human experience. By methodology, I mean that such research draws on a distinctive: epistemology, theory, sets of research questions, group and researcher processes, research ethics and practices, issues of reflexivity and bias, questions of validity, replicability, validity and so forth (de Munck & Sobo 1998).

I articulate a potential taxonomy of different levels of imagework, ranging from introductory imagework, memory imagework, spontaneous imagework and dream imagework (Edgar 1999 and Forthcoming). I propose that the use of imagework methods can generate more holistic expressions of self-identities and implicit world-views, than other current research methodologies. Such results come from combining rational with affective and intuitive aspects of the self. I illustrate my argument with examples.

I demonstrate how such image and dreamwork methods share significant distinctive and common intellectual and pragmatic concerns and issues in their use as research methods that I will develop and illustrate in my paper. For example, until there is further intellectual clarification as to the many forms of the imagination: fantasy, memory, dreaming, trance, vision etc. then the epistemological progress of such a research methodology remains problematic. The Sufi-inspired (Corbin 1966) concept of the imaginal, now being adopted by some New Age theorists (Noel 1977; Rowan 1992) offers a possible way forward.

Overall, I will consider how an imagination-based or imaginally-based research methodology can be coherently constructed, identified and validated as a core means of gaining hitherto, often, unknown understanding of our human condition and potential.

 

 

References

 

Braud, W. and Anderson, R. (1998) Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences, London: Sage.

Corbin, H. (1966) 'The Visionary Dream in Islamic Spirituality', In Von Grunebaum G. and Callois R. (eds.) The Dream in Human Societies, Berkeley: University of California Press.

De Munck & Sobo, E. (1998) Using methods in the Field: A Practical Introduction and Casebook, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira/Sage.

Edgar, I. (1999) 'The Imagework Method in Social Science and Health Research', Qualitative Health Research, 9(2): 198-211.

Edgar, I. (Forthcoming) A Guide to Imagework: Imagination-based Research Methods, London: Routledge.

Noel, D. (1997) The Soul of Shamanism, New York: Continuum.

Pretty, J., Gujit, I., Thompson, J.,& Scoones, I. (1995) A Trainer's Guide for Participatory Learning and Action, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Rowan, J. (1992) The Transpersonal: Psychotherapy and Counselling, London: Routledge,.

 

 

 [abstracts index]  [conference index]  [member pages]

Program Chair: Alan Siegel, Ph.D.
Program Committee: Mark Blagrove, Ph.D.; Kelly Bulkeley, Ph.D.; Rita Dwyer; Nancy Grace, M.A.; Roger Knudson, Ph.D.; Richard Russo, M.A.; Richard Wilkerson; Lilith Wolinsky; Dave Pleasants
Conference Co-Hosts: Nancy Lund, M.A.; Steven Smith, M.B.A.; M.A.; Bob Hoss, M.S.
Host Committee: 

Host Committee :Marilyn Fowler (Volunteer Coordinator); Emily Anderson

ASD Homepage