|
|
|
|
|
ABSTRACT The Canary In The Mind: On
The Fate Of Dreams In Psychoanalysis And In Contemporary Culture –
Summary of Presentation This
is a wide ranging paper touching on the love-hate relationship to dreams
within psychoanalysis with implications for a consideration of the
exploitation, disregard and transformation of dreams in contemporary
technological-electronic society. It is suggested that the fate of dreams
is an early warning signal regarding the fate of the human mind, the human
spirit, as we have come to know it. A range of hypotheses are advanced
about the complex uses of dreams in ancient healing, in contemporary
psychotherapy, in social analysis, and particularly in relation to the
destruction of the natural world and its replacement by an electronic
dream-like existence. Learning Objectives: (1) Participants will learn, by example and by lecture, about contemporary psychoanalytic thinking on dreams, (2) Participants will learn in particular about a contemporary interpersonal-naturalist approach that focuses on the importance of staying with the image and on dream conversation rather than dream interpretation and (3)
Participants will learn about ways of integrating Freud, Jung, Shamanism
and modern psychotherapy in relation to dreams. (1) What does one gain by “staying with the image?” (2) How can shamanic practice influence work with dreams in contemporary psychotherapy? (3)
What is the point, anyhow, of working with dreams in psychotherapy? Abstract
This is a wide ranging paper touching on the love-hate relationship to dreams within psychoanalysis with implications for a consideration of the exploitation, disregard and transformation of dreams in a contemporary technological-electronic society. It is suggested that the fate of dreams is an early warning signal regarding the fate of the human mind, the human spirit, as we have come to know it. A range of hypotheses are advanced about the complex uses of dreams in ancient healing, in contemporary psychotherapy, in social analysis, and particularly in relation to the destruction of the natural world and its replacement by an electronic dream-like existence. |
|
|
|
|
| Program
Chair:
Alan Siegel, Ph.D. Program Committee: Mark Blagrove, Ph.D.; Kelly Bulkeley, Ph.D.; Rita Dwyer; Nancy Grace, M.A.; Roger Knudson, Ph.D.; Richard Russo, M.A.; Richard Wilkerson; Lilith Wolinsky; Dave Pleasants Conference Co-Hosts: Nancy Lund, M.A.; Steven Smith, M.B.A.; M.A.; Bob Hoss, M.S. Host Committee: Host Committee :Marilyn Fowler (Volunteer Coordinator); Emily Anderson |